Posts Tagged ‘God’

Scientific Method: God

December 4, 2015
Post #397
Paarsurrey wrote:

Can science disprove the existence of God?

It is not a question that relates to “scientific method”, scientific method is incapacitated. Right?Please
Regards

ben d likes this.
Post #354
Paarsurrey wrote:

Please read my post #397 in this connection.
Regards

ben d likes this.

Did G-d have direct conversation with the Jewry?

May 26, 2015

Please view and comment on my post at <www.religiousforums.com >  <Thread : Judaism>. One may like to join the discussion by clicking on the post # below.

Post #155

Friend Tumah quoted Deuteronomy – Chapter 4:12 to prove that G-d spoke directly to the Israelite nation as a whole.

Deuteronomy does not supersede the points given in Exodus. Deuteronomy cannot change the event as narrated in Exodus, as the event was just happening at that time. Deuteronomy was exhortation addresses of what had already happened.

The points mentioned by me about Exodus Chapters 19, 20 in my post # 21 <Judaism: no mass revelation of G-d with Jews mentioned in Exodus Chapter 19 and 20 | Page 2 | ReligiousForums.com>, therefore, remain still valid.

The text of the chapters 19,20 of Exodus indicates that:
• neither the people went up the mountain (only Moses and Aaron went as per the text) none other went,
• nor YHWH descended to the masses to talk with them directly,
• the masses were afraid of the YHWH lest He wreaks at them. (What chosen people they , the Jews, claim to be?)
• there was a barricade for the Jews, they could no cross it.
• The conversation was between YHWH and Moses in direct manner up at the mountain.
• It is therefore evident that the communication was indirectly conveyed to masses by Moses.

That proves my point.

Moses wanted to save the Jewish people from the iniquities they could perform in future. The Jews disobeyed Moses and as a people acted against the commandments given to them through Moses by God as mentioned in Deuteronomy.
Instead of being a select people, the Jews became the worst people.

This chapter four of Deuteronomy served as a future charge-sheet given to the Jews by Moses himself.

Regards

Jesus not G-d

May 11, 2015

www.religiousforums.com > <How can God be Jesus, and the father, yet Jesus not be the father?>

http://www.religiousforums.com/threads/how-can-god-be-jesus-and-the-father-yet-jesus-not-be-the-father.176806/#post-4283209

  1. Post #2
  2. Topic: How can God be Jesus, and the father, yet Jesus not be the father?

    Paarsurrey wrote:

    Jesus was never a G-d. It is a wrong notion.
    Regards

    Post #4

Paarsurrey wrote:

You mean that Jesus was a manifestation of G-d like Abraham, Moses and Mirza Ghulam Ahmad 1835-1908? Please elaborate.

Regards

  1. Post #7

    Paarsurrey wrote:

    What do you mean by literal? Do you mean Jesus was not real?
    Regards

     Post #14

Paarsurrey wrote:

All prophets/messengers of G-d like Buddha, Krishna, Zoroaster, Moses, Socrates, Muhammad and Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (1835-1908) being in the image of G-d were endowed this deific nature; Jesus/Esa had no distinction whatsoever in this connection.

Regards

Jesus cannot be physical part of G-d

May 11, 2015

<www.religiousforums.com> under topic <Jesus is under subjection to God>.

Paarsurrey wrote:

G-d is not a physical being so Jesus cannot be His physical part.
It is a wrong notion.

Regards

moorea944 liked this.

Why converse of G-d is needed by humans?

May 7, 2015
  1. Post #3
  2. Paarsurrey wrote: If converse between two human being could lead to cognition of one another; why converse between man and G-d cannot lead to perfect cognition of G-d by a human ? Please

    Regards

One-True-God is not a human construct

May 7, 2015
One may like to comment on my post<www.religiousforums.com> in the topic <Is there anything in the concepts of deity that is not arbitrary?>. Even different views are welcome.
Post #166

paarsurrey said:
One-True-God is not a human construct.

Paarsurrey wrote :

And your evidences that One-True-God is a human construct, please

Regard

“God Recreated the Earth 6,000 Years Ago!”

May 6, 2015

One may view my posts on <www.religiousforums.com>and comment on them even if one differs with me.

Post #534

Paarsurrey wrote:Please quote from the scriptures where it mention literally that “God Recreated the Earth 6,000 Years Ago!”.

Regards

http://www.religiousforums.com/threads/god-recreated-the-earth-6-000-years-ago.174599/page-27#post-4276494

Post #536

Paarsurrey wrote:The scriptures and or more truly the Word of Revelation from the One-True-God are for ethical, moral and spiritual uplift of human beings, as such inference from it in things material is the most unscientific thing to do.
Why do it?
Regards

http://www.religiousforums.com/threads/god-recreated-the-earth-6-000-years-ago.174599/page-27#post-4276802

God Himself is a Zionist.!?

November 6, 2014

I wrote following post on one of my favorite discussion forums <https://www.religiousforums.com/threads/god-himself-is-a-zionist.170260/page-2#post-4011538 >

Post #29 thread/topic <God Himself is a Zionist.!?>

One could join the discussion on the forum or here on this blog.

Paarsurrey wrote:

No, emphatic no.
G-d is not for a particular place/town/city/country/race/nation:

The Holy Quran : Chapter 1: Al-Fatihah

[1:1]In the name of Allah, the Gracious, the Merciful.
[1:2]All praise belongs to Allah, Lord of all the worlds,
[1:3]The Gracious, the Merciful,
[1:4]Master of the Day of Judgment.
[1:5]Thee alone do we worship and Thee alone do we implore for help.
[1:6]Guide us in the right path —
[1:7]The path of those on whom Thou hast bestowedThyblessings, those who have not incurredThydispleasure, and those who have not gone astray.
http://www.alislam.org/quran/search2/showChapter.php?ch=1

Regards

Scientists Say Belief in God Is Hard Wired In Human DNA

August 9, 2014

http://www.religiousforums.com/forum/3877041-post41.html
http://www.atheistrepublic.com/news/scientists-say-atheism-isn-t-real-all-people-innately-believe-god

“Scientists Say Everyone Believes in God”!
Please access the above links to understand the context of the discussion and to join it.

Originally Posted by paarsurrey
We can safely conclude that belief in One-True-God is the original position.

Originally Posted by Sunstone
Do you mean in much the same sense that cognitive biases can be considered “the original position”?

Paarsurrey wrote:

Since man evolved in millions of years; one could be named a man distinct from animal when he got to the stage distinctly and starkly different from the animal. That epoch making event came when the one-True-Go had a Converse with man through a prophet named Adam.

In this sense it is the original position.

Regards

It is a blemish for the One-True-God to take a physical human form

May 14, 2014

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/exploringourmatrix/2014/05/i-am-the-walruslogos.html#comment-1382980335

paarsurrey
@Rebecca Trotter
“I think that when God became embodied, he would have had to go through a sort of forgetting process in order to experience life fully as a man.”

Sorry. I don’t agree with you.

It is a blemish for the One-True-God to take a physical human form. It never happened. If John stated; he must have wrongly understood or wrongly interpreted.

Regards