Posts Tagged ‘God’

“Arguments for the singularity of a deity”

July 24, 2017

Just to share the debate I have joined in “” on the  topic “Arguments for the singularity of a deity”.

 Doombringer1000Norse Heathen

Hello all. I have realized lately that I have never seen an argument for the singularity of a deity. By this I mean that all arguments I have seen for the existence of any god works equally as well for the existence of many. Of course, you can’t make the leap from “there is a god/gods”, to “this/these god/gods are the only true god/gods because my holy book/elders/religious tradition says so”. I’m looking for logical arguments for either a singular god or a singular pantheon, as I can’t find any.

Of course, as a Norse Heathen, I am a polytheist myself, but I welcome any thought provoking answers to this question. So, if you think I missed some arguments let me know! after 4 UCT I will be at work, so it might take me awhile to respond; however, I will attempt to get back to every top level comment I receive.

Thank you in advance, and best wishes.


Can you please explain your train of thought? As it is, your statement is incoherent.




Which God or no-god is Truthful?

April 2, 2017

What is wrong with smashing the idols?
sub-title: Which God or no-god is Truthfu

My most cherished discussion forum Religious Forums

I give here my posts and posts from others, mentioning the post numbers without giving the names of the other persons whose posts I wrote my comments on. Please click the post numbers to get to know the persons.

#705 paarsurrey wrote:

What is wrong with smashing the idols?
sub-title: Which God or no-god is Truthful? (reference post #701 to #703 )

No-God cannot create anything from nothing. Right? Please
The truthful God is ascertained from the attributes of a religion (or no-religion) given in its scripture that are the verities or His attributes reflected in the nature, created by Him. Please

Scientific Method: God

December 4, 2015
Post #397
Paarsurrey wrote:

Can science disprove the existence of God?

It is not a question that relates to “scientific method”, scientific method is incapacitated. Right?Please

ben d likes this.
Post #354
Paarsurrey wrote:

Please read my post #397 in this connection.

ben d likes this.

Did G-d have direct conversation with the Jewry?

May 26, 2015

Please view and comment on my post at < >  <Thread : Judaism>. One may like to join the discussion by clicking on the post # below.

Post #155

Friend Tumah quoted Deuteronomy – Chapter 4:12 to prove that G-d spoke directly to the Israelite nation as a whole.

Deuteronomy does not supersede the points given in Exodus. Deuteronomy cannot change the event as narrated in Exodus, as the event was just happening at that time. Deuteronomy was exhortation addresses of what had already happened.

The points mentioned by me about Exodus Chapters 19, 20 in my post # 21 <Judaism: no mass revelation of G-d with Jews mentioned in Exodus Chapter 19 and 20 | Page 2 |>, therefore, remain still valid.

The text of the chapters 19,20 of Exodus indicates that:
• neither the people went up the mountain (only Moses and Aaron went as per the text) none other went,
• nor YHWH descended to the masses to talk with them directly,
• the masses were afraid of the YHWH lest He wreaks at them. (What chosen people they , the Jews, claim to be?)
• there was a barricade for the Jews, they could no cross it.
• The conversation was between YHWH and Moses in direct manner up at the mountain.
• It is therefore evident that the communication was indirectly conveyed to masses by Moses.

That proves my point.

Moses wanted to save the Jewish people from the iniquities they could perform in future. The Jews disobeyed Moses and as a people acted against the commandments given to them through Moses by God as mentioned in Deuteronomy.
Instead of being a select people, the Jews became the worst people.

This chapter four of Deuteronomy served as a future charge-sheet given to the Jews by Moses himself.


Jesus not G-d

May 11, 2015 > <How can God be Jesus, and the father, yet Jesus not be the father?>

  1. Post #2
  2. Topic: How can God be Jesus, and the father, yet Jesus not be the father?

    Paarsurrey wrote:

    Jesus was never a G-d. It is a wrong notion.

    Post #4

Paarsurrey wrote:

You mean that Jesus was a manifestation of G-d like Abraham, Moses and Mirza Ghulam Ahmad 1835-1908? Please elaborate.


  1. Post #7

    Paarsurrey wrote:

    What do you mean by literal? Do you mean Jesus was not real?

     Post #14

Paarsurrey wrote:

All prophets/messengers of G-d like Buddha, Krishna, Zoroaster, Moses, Socrates, Muhammad and Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (1835-1908) being in the image of G-d were endowed this deific nature; Jesus/Esa had no distinction whatsoever in this connection.


Jesus cannot be physical part of G-d

May 11, 2015

<> under topic <Jesus is under subjection to God>.

Paarsurrey wrote:

G-d is not a physical being so Jesus cannot be His physical part.
It is a wrong notion.


moorea944 liked this.

Why converse of G-d is needed by humans?

May 7, 2015
  1. Post #3
  2. Paarsurrey wrote: If converse between two human being could lead to cognition of one another; why converse between man and G-d cannot lead to perfect cognition of G-d by a human ? Please


One-True-God is not a human construct

May 7, 2015
One may like to comment on my post<> in the topic <Is there anything in the concepts of deity that is not arbitrary?>. Even different views are welcome.
Post #166

paarsurrey said:
One-True-God is not a human construct.

Paarsurrey wrote :

And your evidences that One-True-God is a human construct, please


“God Recreated the Earth 6,000 Years Ago!”

May 6, 2015

One may view my posts on <>and comment on them even if one differs with me.

Post #534

Paarsurrey wrote:Please quote from the scriptures where it mention literally that “God Recreated the Earth 6,000 Years Ago!”.


Post #536

Paarsurrey wrote:The scriptures and or more truly the Word of Revelation from the One-True-God are for ethical, moral and spiritual uplift of human beings, as such inference from it in things material is the most unscientific thing to do.
Why do it?

God Himself is a Zionist.!?

November 6, 2014

I wrote following post on one of my favorite discussion forums < >

Post #29 thread/topic <God Himself is a Zionist.!?>

One could join the discussion on the forum or here on this blog.

Paarsurrey wrote:

No, emphatic no.
G-d is not for a particular place/town/city/country/race/nation:

The Holy Quran : Chapter 1: Al-Fatihah

[1:1]In the name of Allah, the Gracious, the Merciful.
[1:2]All praise belongs to Allah, Lord of all the worlds,
[1:3]The Gracious, the Merciful,
[1:4]Master of the Day of Judgment.
[1:5]Thee alone do we worship and Thee alone do we implore for help.
[1:6]Guide us in the right path —
[1:7]The path of those on whom Thou hast bestowedThyblessings, those who have not incurredThydispleasure, and those who have not gone astray.