Can science disprove the existence of God?
It is not a question that relates to “scientific method”, scientific method is incapacitated. Right?Please
< www.religiousforums.com > <How can God be Jesus, and the father, yet Jesus not be the father?>
<www.religiousforums.com> under topic <Jesus is under subjection to God>.
One may view my posts on <www.religiousforums.com>and comment on them even if one differs with me.
Paarsurrey wrote:Please quote from the scriptures where it mention literally that “God Recreated the Earth 6,000 Years Ago!”.
Paarsurrey wrote:The scriptures and or more truly the Word of Revelation from the One-True-God are for ethical, moral and spiritual uplift of human beings, as such inference from it in things material is the most unscientific thing to do.
Why do it?
I wrote following post on one of my favorite discussion forums <https://www.religiousforums.com/threads/god-himself-is-a-zionist.170260/page-2#post-4011538 >
Post #29 thread/topic <God Himself is a Zionist.!?>
One could join the discussion on the forum or here on this blog.
No, emphatic no.
G-d is not for a particular place/town/city/country/race/nation:
The Holy Quran : Chapter 1: Al-Fatihah
[1:1]In the name of Allah, the Gracious, the Merciful.
[1:2]All praise belongs to Allah, Lord of all the worlds,
[1:3]The Gracious, the Merciful,
[1:4]Master of the Day of Judgment.
[1:5]Thee alone do we worship and Thee alone do we implore for help.
[1:6]Guide us in the right path —
[1:7]The path of those on whom Thou hast bestowedThyblessings, those who have not incurredThydispleasure, and those who have not gone astray.
“Scientists Say Everyone Believes in God”!
Please access the above links to understand the context of the discussion and to join it.
Originally Posted by paarsurrey
We can safely conclude that belief in One-True-God is the original position.
Originally Posted by Sunstone
Do you mean in much the same sense that cognitive biases can be considered “the original position”?
Since man evolved in millions of years; one could be named a man distinct from animal when he got to the stage distinctly and starkly different from the animal. That epoch making event came when the one-True-Go had a Converse with man through a prophet named Adam.
In this sense it is the original position.
“I think that when God became embodied, he would have had to go through a sort of forgetting process in order to experience life fully as a man.”
Sorry. I don’t agree with you.
It is a blemish for the One-True-God to take a physical human form. It never happened. If John stated; he must have wrongly understood or wrongly interpreted.