Jesus not G-d

< www.religiousforums.com > <How can God be Jesus, and the father, yet Jesus not be the father?>

http://www.religiousforums.com/threads/how-can-god-be-jesus-and-the-father-yet-jesus-not-be-the-father.176806/#post-4283209

1. Post #2
2. Topic: How can God be Jesus, and the father, yet Jesus not be the father?
   
   Paarsurrey wrote:

   Jesus was never a G-d. It is a wrong notion.
   Regards

   Post #4

disciple said: ↑

I believe that Jesus is a manifestation of the father. So, you are correct, He was never a ///separate god.

Paarsurrey wrote:

You mean that Jesus was a manifestation of G-d like Abraham, Moses and Mirza Ghulam Ahmad 1835-1908? Please elaborate.

Regards

1. Post #7
   

   disciple said: ↑

   Jesus as a ‘man’ is not literal, that is why He doesn’t have a father

   Paarsurrey wrote:

   What do you mean by literal? Do you mean Jesus was not real?
   Regards

    Post #14

disciple said: ↑

When we talk about Esa, we are regarding His deific nature. He could very well have an Israelite, a ‘man’, however, his nature is that of a Deity. This is why He is regarded as G-d, by Xians. The non-Human form of Jesus, is also Jesus, yet we clearly know that He is Deific; so, ”real”, here is not what Jesus adherents would be completely focused on, we don’t worship a man. We worship His Deific form, nature, regardless of Him being part man or a manifestation of G-d.

This really depends on how you are defining ”real”.

Paarsurrey wrote:

All prophets/messengers of G-d like Buddha, Krishna, Zoroaster, Moses, Socrates, Muhammad and Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (1835-1908) being in the image of G-d were endowed this deific nature; Jesus/Esa had no distinction whatsoever in this connection.

Regards

Advertisements

Tags: deific, God, Jesus, literal, manifestation, real