I have written following comments on Richard Carrier’s “Freethought Blogs”.
Topic: “Minor Corrections to Crossley’s Jesus in an Age of Neoliberalism” by Richard Carrier
http://freethoughtblogs.com/carrier/archives/5354#comment-203221
paarsurrey
April 23, 2014 at 9:22 am (awaiting moderation)
“Similarly, Crossley rightly takes to task the reactionary Islamophobia of Dawkins, Hitchens, and Harris, but falsely treats that as representative of New Atheism, when in fact the bulk of the New Atheist movement has been consistently criticizing them for precisely these views.” Unquote
I read Hitchens book “God is not great”; and noticed that he had no in-depth study of Quran/Islam/Muhammad and generalized things from his experience with Christianity and had a biased view of Quran/Islam/Muhammad.
In the entire book Hitchens could not quote even a single verse from Quran in support of his views about Quran/Islam/Muhammad; though the title of the book suggests that his intention was to write the book against Islam.
I appreciate Atheists’ approach of being reason-oriented and hence drawing the attention of the Revealed Religions for reformation of the peripheral, mythical and superstitious creeds. They could go into the process of reformation while keeping the core teachings intact.
Thanks and regards
Tags: core teachings, Crossley, Dawkins, Freethought Blogs, Harris, Hitchens, Islamophobia, mythical, New Atheism, new atheist, peripheral, Quran/Islam/Muhammad, reformation, Richard Carrier, superstitious
June 5, 2021 at 9:10 am |
Reblogged this on paarsurrey.
LikeLike