Why “Second Coming” is to “Break the Cross”?

Please view paarsurrey’s post #164 on RF.

Jesus: The Misunderstood Messiah

paarsurrey wrote :vide Post #164 : < (Please click on the post # to get right into the discussion to join in , please)

Yes, Jesus was misunderstood in his “First Coming”*, I agree.

The “Second Coming” of innocent Jesus s/o Mary, I understand, is therefore afforded by God-the-Father/Allah/Jehovah to the Messiah so that he could save the world in the “End of Times”** from the trance of a faked vision of (sinful) Paul*** and its aftermath, by which Paul (the wolf in sheep’s clothing*** ) derailed “the sheep” from the ways , path and the of truthful teachings of the “Shepherd” some 2000 years ago with the result Pauline-Christianity has become the breeding ground of (Western) Atheism. “Second Coming” is to reclaim them back into the folds of the truthful Religion by reasonable arguments, please. Kindly correct me if I am wrong, please. Right?

Regards

_________
*”The First Coming: How the Kingdom of God Became Christianity “- (1986—electronic edition 2000) (by) Thomas Sheehan.
“Introduction: How Christianity Came Into Crisis”

“Today at the dawn of her third millennium, the Christian church is undergoing a theological crisis in what she thinks and believes about Jesus of Nazareth.
The crisis grows out of a fact now freely admitted by both Protestant and Catholic theologians and exegetes: that as far as can be discerned from the available historical data, Jesus of Nazareth did not think he was divine, did not assert any of the messianic claims that the New Testament attributes to him, and went to his death without intending to found a new religion called “Christianity.” That is, the theological crisis has to do with the prima facie discrepancy between what Jesus of Nazareth apparently thought he was (a special but very human prophet) and what mainline Christian believers now take him to be (the divine Son of God, consubstantial with the Father and the Holy Spirit).
[1] The apparent difference between the “Jesus of history” and the “Christ of faith” is not a new problem in Christianity. Since the last century liberal Protestant scholars like Adolf von Harnack and agnostics like Ernest Renan have tried to strip away what they thought were 6 the church’s divinizing embellishments of Jesus of Nazareth so as to arrive at the “real” (that is, the human) prophet of Nazareth.”
https://religiousstudies.stanford.e…_sheehan_the_first_coming_how_the_kingdom.pdf
Search terms:<Jesus was misunderstood in his “First Coming”>

**The end time (also called end times, end of time, end of days, last days, final days, doomsday, or eschaton) is a future described variously in the eschatologies of several world religions (both Abrahamic and non-Abrahamic), which teach that world events will reach a climax.
End time

***Pauline Christianity or Pauline theology (also Paulism or Paulanity),[2] otherwise referred to as Gentile Christianity, is the theology and form of Christianity which developed from the beliefs and doctrines espoused by the Hellenistic-Jewish Apostle Paul through his writings and those New Testament writings traditionally attributed to him. Paul’s beliefs were rooted in the earliest Jewish Christianity, but deviated from this Jewish Christianity in their emphasis on inclusion of the Gentiles into God’s New Covenant, and his rejection of circumcision as an unnecessary token of upholding the Law.
Pauline Christianity – Wikipedia
Matthew 7:15
*** “Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing but inwardly are ravenous wolves. “

Tags: , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: