Posts Tagged ‘Skeptic’

“The Atheist Blogroll”

February 5, 2014

“The Atheist Blogroll”

I wrote following post on the above “The Atheist Blogroll”:

paarsurrey said

I am an Ahmadi peaceful Muslim. I am not an Atheist or Agnostic or Skeptic; though I respect them and would like to discuss with them; if they stick to reason as far as reason could go.

February 5, 2014 at 10:29 AM

March 26, 2013

Paarsurrey says:

In fact, in my opinion, Jesus did not die on the cross;though he was near-dead. His friends wanted to treat Jesus’ injuries in a solitary place hidden from the public eyes; hence the selection. When healed from his wounds Jesus travelled to India and died a natural and peaceful death in Srinagar, Kashmir.

Please view the following link:

Siddhartha Gautama Buddha was not a skeptic, atheist or agnostic

March 19, 2013

Siddhartha GautamaImage of Siddhartha Gautama

image of Buddha

The history and life account of Siddhartha Gautama is imbued with the Buddhist denominational feuds. Buddha did not write any biography that would have survived to our times that could be relied upon for certain.

The skeptics who claim to follow reason should not follow a denominational line just because it suits their philosophy, this would be a biased approach on their part.

Please just see above some pictures of Siddhartha Gautama.

Please tell me frankly; are there any renowned skeptics like Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens etc., who ever are used to be seen in such postures in their daily life?

So, Siddhartha Gautama Buddha was not a skeptic, atheist or agnostic, he never was.



Buddhism is sometimes described as nontheistic because of the absence of a creator god, but that can be too simplistic a view.[120][121]

  1. According to Merv Fowler, some forms of Buddhism have incorporated concepts that resemble that of Brahman, which suggests theism. Merv Fowler, Buddhism: Beliefs and Practices(Brighton: Sussex Academic, 1999), p. 34: “It was inevitable that the non-theistic philosophy of orthodox Buddhism should court the older Hindu practices and, in particular, infuse into its philosophy the belief in a totally transcendent Absolute of the nature of Brahman.”
  2. ^Wallace, B. Alan Ph.D. (November 1999). “Is Buddhism Really Non-Theistic?” (PDF). National Conference of the American Academy of Religion lectures. Boston. p. 8. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 4, 2016. Retrieved July 22, 2014.“Thus, in light of the theoretical progression from the bhavaºga to the tath›gatagarbha to the primordial wisdom of the absolute space of reality, Buddhism is not so simply non-theistic as it may appear at first glance.”



Holy War -the peaceful version- with reasons, arguments and peaceful dialogue

The News:

One will, perhaps, love to read the following:

“Holy War”: Is it Armageddon? with its ” Peaceful Version”! 1

“Holy War”: Is it Armegiddon / Armageddon? – with its “Peaceful Version”! 1 | paarsurrey (

One will be taken aback to note that Armegiddon/Armageddon is nothing like as one would have imagined or known so far. It is not to be fought with any physical and destructive weaponry and or the lethal arsenal of the day. It is peaceful and in fact, I understand, it has already started and it is sown like a seed!

It was a debate between the Pauline-Christianity (represented by Mr. Abdullah Atham) and the Second Coming 1835-1908 , that took place in Urdu language and was published then by the name “Jang-e-Muqaddas” in 1893 ( 22 May 1893 to 5 June 1893) in the then British India and has been recently translated and published in English by the name “The Holy War”:

The Holy War — A DEBATE BETWEEN ISLAM & CHRISTIANITY — Jang-e-Muqaddas (


From: a peaceful Ahmadiyya Muslim


These are the days of Armageddon – the final battle between good and evil –The peaceful Version! 3 

Has Armageddon already started with the advent of Second Coming 1835-1908 ?– The peaceful Version! 2

Click to access Is%20Buddhism%20Really%20Nontheistic_.pdf

Paarsurrey defends all revealed religions on Truth

May 17, 2011

Paarsurrey defends all Revealed Religions on Truth; refusing to believe their mythical part and reinstating the reason part that they have missed under debris of time; Paarsurrey also appreciates the Atheists Agnostics Skeptics Apatheists if they adhere to reason and rational arguments and they don’t ridicule and deride the theists.

Is it not fair?

%d bloggers like this: