Posts Tagged ‘criterion’

Criterion of finding truth in religions and non-religions

April 7, 2014

The viewers should access the following link to know the context of the discussion; and only then one should form one’s own sincere and independent opinion.

http://jerichobrisance.com/2014/04/02/snapthought-wrested-from-my-hands-by-god/comment-page-1/#comment-6620

paarsurrey says:
April 7, 2014 at :
@(Matt) Brisancian :April 6, 2014

“If you would, please give your criterion for falsifiability of religious texts as either divinely inspired or merely human in origin. However, the criterion cannot be circularly dependent upon the text itself or the author(s).
Your answer will be the beginning of my response.” Unquote

One could be born in any religion or without a religion. It is beyond one to decide where to be born. Wherever one is born; that starts one’s journey to find the truth.

The tools make easy for one to do a job. It is therefore important for one first to find a tool that gives equal opportunity to every religion to search.

Using a tool and then making a comparative study of religions to find which one is the most truthful religion is therefore most reasonable and rational.

I give here a principle of comparative study of religions which was suggested by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad- the Promised Messiah 1835-1908 in an essay that was read in a Conference of Great Religions held at Lahore in 1896; and was later published in a book form titled “The Philosophy of the Teachings of Islam” translated in many languages of the world.

I give below the principle and its explanation in precisely his words:

“It is necessary that a claim and the reasons in support of it must be set forth from a revealed book”
“I consider it essential that everyone who follows a book, believing it to be revealed, should base his exposition upon that book and should not so extend the scope of his advocacy of his faith as if he is compiling a new book.

As it is my purpose today to establish the merits of the Holy Quran and to demonstrate its excellence, it is incumbent upon me not to state anything which is not comprehended in the Quran and to set forth everything on the basis of its verses and in accord with their meaning and that which might be inferred from them, so that those attending the Conference should encounter no difficulty in carrying out a comparison between the teachings of different religions.”

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad adhered to this principle and answered the five important questions set by the moderators of the Conference:

1. The physical, moral and spiritual states of man
2. The state of man after death.
3. The object of man’s life and the means to its attainment.
4. The operation of the practical ordinances of the Law in this life and the next.
5. Sources of Divine knowledge.

One could access the following link to read the book available online, freely:

http://www.alislam.org/library/books/Philosophy-of-Teachings-of-Islam.pdf

The Atheists/Agnostics/Skeptics don’t have a book to follow. They extol science to find answers to all the questions in the world. Although the questions don’t fall within the scope of science and would overburden it; yet they are open to answer with the condition that they quote some standards text book of science for the claims to answers as also to the reasons given specifying the discipline of science that legitimately deals with it.

Please take your time for your journey of search and as to how the criterion is to be applied. Please read the small book mentioned above; that will provide ready-made solution to many questions that arise.

Wish you good-luck.

Thanks and regards

PAARSURREY ASKS LITTLE QUESTIONS FROM ATHIEST/S

February 28, 2014

“THE SUPERSTITIOUS NAKED APE” “THE MORAL AUTONOMY ARGUMENT”

http://THESUPERSTITIOUSNAKEDAPE.WORDPRESS.COM/

http://THESUPERSTITIOUSNAKEDAPE.WORDPRESS.COM/2014/02/17/THE-MORAL-AUTONOMY-ARGUMENT/COMMENT-PAGE-1/#COMMENT-12477

PAARSURREY says:
February 27, 2014 at 10:46 pm

“6. This is immoral, unless we can continuously be sure the being we are worshipping is (perfectly) good, and that the being we are worshipping is indeed a (or the) “God”
The One-True-God (Allah Yahweh, Aura-Mazda, Parmeshawara, Eshawara); is (perfectly) good and is worthy of worship.

PAARSURREY says:
February 27, 2014 at 11:02 pm

I know this from His attributes mentioned in Quran; and summarized in its first chapter .

PAARSURREY says:
February 28, 2014 at 3:45 pm

@DAZ says:February 28, 2014 at 3:33 pm
I don’t get you exactly. Please elaborate

PAARSURREY says:
February 28, 2014 at 4:48 pm

@ DAZ says:February 28, 2014 at 4:26 pm
“Since “it is written in a book” seems to be your criterion for deciding whether something is true or not”

You get me wrong.

In the matters or religion which deals in ethical, moral and spiritual matters, one has to follow the revealed book of one’s religion; so being an Ahmadi peaceful Muslim I follow Quran and hence for all claims (in ethical, moral and spiritual fields), I must quote the claims and gist of reasons mentioned in Quran not authored by Muhammad by the One-True-God.

In secular matters; one has to follow the law of the land one lives in.
In scientific matters I would follow the authentic text books of science, if there is a need to follow. I am an ordinary man in the street, with no claims of any piety or scholarship.

This is my position. Please

PAARSURREY says:
February 28, 2014 at 5:07 pm

@Daz
“Harry Potter”

Do the Atheists like you follow Harry Potter or his novel?

PAARSURREY says:
February 28, 2014 at 8:50 pm

@DAZ :February 28, 2014 at 5:09 pm
“No: because it’s fiction.”

I think you won’t mind if you answer my little questions here.

1. What other book do you and other Atheists follow in Ethics, if at all the Atheists believe in human ethics?
2. Who is your role model , and of other, Atheists in Ethics? If there is one; do you, or other Atheists, follow him?

Thanks

http://thesuperstitiousnakedape.wordpress.com/2014/02/17/the-moral-autonomy-argument/comment-page-1/#comment-12477