Archive for the ‘Atheism unreasonable’ Category

Atheism is emptiness

November 22, 2017

Atheism is the lack of belief in gods, and lacking is like emptiness. The prime reason is that Atheism is completely unsupported by verifiable evidence of its own as an ideology and due to its own faults they don’t believe in the existence of One-True-God/YHVH/Allah, nevertheless they have faith in Atheism. Belief in God or No-God is beyond the limits of science which is a tool limited in the physical and material domains. Whatever the science discovers is never created by it, it only discovers that had already been created by One-True-God/YHVH/Allah.God is Great. 

Thread: “What is the evidence that physics have been/are different? “Debating Christianity and Religion Forum Index -> Science and Religion

Post 23: 

[Replying to post 16 by paarsurrey1]

Quote:
…not to mention that Atheism with all its hues and forms are not supported by science.

X——- wrote:

Atheism is the lack of belief in gods. The prime reason is that theism is completely unsupported by verifiable evidence for the existence of gods, further enhanced by the requirement of faith in theism. The more that science discovers about the world we live in, the further gods of all description recede into the background.

Paarsurrey wrote:

Atheism is the lack of belief in gods, and lacking is like emptiness. The prime reason is that Atheism is completely unsupported by verifiable evidence of its own as an ideology and due to its own faults they don’t believe in the existence of One-True-God/YHVH/Allah, nevertheless they have faith in Atheism. Belief in God or No-God is beyond the limits of science which is a tool limited in the physical and material domains. Whatever the science discovers is never created by it, it only discovers that had already been created by One-True-God/YHVH/Allah.God is Great.
Right, please?

Regards

The retention rate of Atheists is 30%, the lowest

June 25, 2014

Please access the link below to know the context of the discussion or to join it. One may comment at this blog if one likes.
http://www.religiousforums.com/forum/3816509-post20.html

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinayaka
Here’s a study comparing retention rates by religion. (Just for US, I think) I think all faiths struggle to some extent these days. With much more education available, people shift around a lot more in belief, that I suspect they did even 50 years back.

I don’t see it as a bad thing, just an observation on life.

Thoughts?

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/genevei…tention-rates/” Unquote

Paarsurrey wrote:

The retention rate of Atheists is 30%, the lowest, because those belonging to Atheism became as such without a positive proof or evidence in its favor; they must shift it as soon as they realize their blunder.

Regards

Atheism is 100% faith-based :SILENCEOFMIND

May 11, 2014

http://thesuperstitiousnakedape.wordpress.com/2014/05/08/christian-logic/comment-page-1/#comment-15227

SILENCEOFMIND says:
May 9, 2014 at 3:34 pm

Ron,
Since you cannot prove atheism, that means you have 100% faith in it.
You have no evidence for atheism. You just believe it because you hate Christianity.
To reason out rational arguments the claim you are making must be able to stand on its own merits.
Because atheism cannot stand on its own merits, the atheist is left making bigoted attacks on bigoted attacks and committing verbal abuse on anyone who dares offer disagreement.

http://thesuperstitiousnakedape.wordpress.com/2014/05/08/christian-logic/comment-page-1/#comment-15310

Paarsurrey says:

I appreciate your comments.

Regards

http://thesuperstitiousnakedape.wordpress.com/2014/05/08/christian-logic/comment-page-1/#comment-15315

PAARSURREY says:
May 11, 2014 at 4:01 pm
@JOHN ZANDE : May 11, 2014 at 3:37 pm

He might be sometimes; but I have never seen any positive argument favoring Atheism from anybody .
Whenever somebody challenges Atheism; they hide behind “burden of proof”; that suggests Atheism is faith based; cannot stand on its own feet.

I know that Christianity is mythical; it does not belong to teachings of Jesus; and is based on Pauline creeds.

Atheism is a fruit of Pauline Christianity; it surfaced in reaction to mythical creeds of Pauline Christianity.

Regards

A question from Richard Carrier

May 10, 2014

http://freethoughtblogs.com/carrier/archives/4458#comment-242177

paarsurrey
May 10, 2014 at 12:05 pm (comment awaiting moderation)

@Richard Carrier: May 7, 2014 at 10:40 am

You were in Taoism. What was in Taoism that you were a Taoist?
For what positive arguments in Atheism you converted to it from Taoism?
Please

Regards

Sam Harris interviews Ayaan Hirsi Ali

May 10, 2014

Sam Harris blog
“Lifting the Veil of ‘Islamophobia’:A Conversation with Ayaan Hirsi Ali”

http://www.samharris.org/blog/item/lifting-the-veil-of-islamophobia

I would have commented on Sam Harris’ blog but found no comments column on his blog, hence I am commenting here.

Paarsurrey says:

“She embraced Islam while she was growing up, but eventually began to question aspects of the faith”-

Anybody who is in a religion must be in for its core teachings; the other things are to be read and interpreted within the core teachings.

The interview fails to show as to why Ayaan Hirsi Ali embraced Islam in the first place. If she had embraced for the truth of Islam as described in its articles of faith or in the pillars of faith- the core teachings of Islam; then she would have remained in it whatever the suffering due to socio-cultural and political conditions prevailing part of the world she lived.

The socio cultural and political conditions could be reformed; and that is what she was supposed to be doing.

Instead, she opted to leap in the dark and went Atheist for no good reason.

What positive truth did she find in Atheism?

She fails to describe it in the interview.

She or any other Atheist could answer this question. Please

Atheism is just a rubble; good for nothing

May 7, 2014

http://fidedubitandum.wordpress.com/2014/05/02/if-you-redefine-christianity-its-ridiculous/#comment-4207

paarsurrey
May 7th, 2014 at 5:34 am
@Debilis : May 6th, 2014 at 8:18 pm
“But you seem to be doing exactly that: thinking that dismissing (not refuting, merely dismissing) a particular text in a larger collection is somehow a reason to be a materialist atheist.”

It could only hint at reformation of a particular faith to which the scripture belongs.

Certainly it is no reason to be a materialist atheist.

Validity of Atheism is to be separately and positively proved and evidenced (and established); and that has never been done by any Atheist.

If one destroys a building that never would automatically erect another building.

Every building has to have a separate foundation and structure.

Atheism is just a rubble; good for nothing.

Regards

Converted from a Christian to Taoism and then to Atheism; under what principled approach?

April 29, 2014

I have asked this question from Richard Carrier:

http://freethoughtblogs.com/carrier/archives/4458#comment-215829

paarsurrey
April 29, 2014 at 4:09 am (under moderation)

@Richard Carrier: April 28, 2014 at 9:36 am

I understand that you were born a Methodist Christian and decided to convert to Taoism at a very tender age of 15 years and then converted to Atheism at the age of 21 years.

Under what principled approach you did that on both occasions?

Regards

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

I received a response from Richard Carrier that could be viewed at the following link:

http://freethoughtblogs.com/carrier/archives/4458#comment-218567

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Question Everything (Except…)

April 29, 2014

“If he (an Atheist) can’t defend his view on the same terms that he asks that theism be defended, then he has not made a case that his view is superior.”

A very good point.

Fide Dubitandum

tumblr_m8tq30CQvB1rq27uuo1_500 In his “Miracle of Theism”, Mackie discusses the idea that people might believe in God without any rational reason. In fact, he discusses a few ideas under that heading, asking whether fideism (belief without reason) can be an intellectually respectable position.

My position, like Mackie’s, is that it cannot. In fact, I want to do Mackie one better and say that “just because I believe” is not an intellectually respectable position regardless of the content of that belief.

Mackie, it seems, is only interested in this question as it relates to theism. It never seems to occur to him that, if one must give a reason for one’s beliefs, then materialists, neutral monists, non-reductive naturalists, and other non-theists must also defend their views.

It is, I would say, the general approach of the non-theist to appeal to his/her views as a sort of default position, a thing not to…

View original post 179 more words

Atheists and their hatred of “religion”

April 14, 2014

I appreciate the following excerpt from the post “When Religion is not Religion” at the blog “triangulations” which could be viewed at the following link:

http://triangulations.wordpress.com/2014/04/14/when-religion-is-not-religion/

Quote: “Religion” is the word in which these atheists package their hate. When challenged with their overgeneralization about religions by pointing out religions practiced by real people that don’t contain any of the repulsive things they associate with the word “religion”, these atheists often just deny that such practices are really “religions”. You see, they are committed to hating the word “religion”.Unquote
http://triangulations.wordpress.com/2014/04/14/when-religion-is-not-religion/

I concur with Sabio Lantz on this observation.

paarsurrey

Atheism is asserted without evidence so it can be dismissed without evidence

January 18, 2014

Atheism being an extraordinary belief needs most extraordinary evidences

Hitchens’ razor cuts throat of Atheism.

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/unfundamentalistchristians/2014/01/creationist-ken-ham-versus-the-truth/#comment-1197434041

paarsurrey W Rick_K

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/unfundamentalistchristians/2014/01/creationist-ken-ham-versus-the-truth/#comment-1197316210

Please give your evidence that the One-True-God (Allah Yahweh Ahura-Mazda Parmeshwara Ishawara) does not exist; I won’t leave my present default natural position; unless there are strong evidence/s against it and I get convinced to it.

Rick_K @ paarsurrey

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/unfundamentalistchristians/2014/01/creationist-ken-ham-versus-the-truth/#comment-1197434041

And I won’t leave my belief that there is an incorporeal, invisible, magical dragon living in my garage unless you can prove it doesn’t exist.

And I will continue to believe you are a figment of my imagination and don’t actually exist until you can prove otherwise.

See how easy that is?

Here’s the deal, paarsurrey – extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. You are making the claim about some intelligent superbeing who affects everything but is completely undetectable. That requires not only some evidence to be believed, but extraordinary evidence.
The burden of proof is on you, not us. You are welcome to assert that your particular flavor of deity exists. But to borrow from Mr. Hitchens: What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.

paarsurrey @ Rick_K
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/unfundamentalistchristians/2014/01/creationist-ken-ham-versus-the-truth/#comment-1198425763

I think Atheists claims are not only extraordinary but also weird instead of the one that I believe which is very natural and a default position.. As differing human beings the Atheists Agnostics Skeptics have a right to coexist though:

[109:1] In the name of Allah, the Gracious, the Merciful.,
[109:2] Say, ‘O ye disbelievers!
[109:3] ‘I worship not that which you worship;
[109:4] ‘Nor worship you what I worship.
[109:5] ‘And I am not going to worship that which you
worship;
[109:6] ‘Nor will you worship what I worship.
[109:7] ‘For you your religion, and for me my religion.’
http://www.alislam.org/quran/s…

Please refer to verse # [109:2] and verse # [109:7].

I think it would be most relevant about Atheism to say that atheistic claims are without evidence to start with hence no need to be believed as truthful.

I don’t hate Atheists .

I respect you.