“Do you think the Roman Catholic Church is hiding truths?”

“Do you think the Roman Catholic Church is hiding truths?”

By Silencio Barnes

Do you think that the Roman Catholic Church is hiding truths about religion and the world as we know it? They have been around for quite a while and have had their fingers in every pot in every place. I think of the Vatican as a sort of religious Pentagon, hiding secrets that they feel the world should probably not know. Any thoughts on this?

https://www.mylot.com/post/598201/do-you-think-the-roman-catholic-church-is-hiding-truths


paarsurrey

I do respect everybody’s faith, but I can’t resist agreeing with you that the Catholic Church is too secretive, from the very beginning it was based on mysteries.

Please don’t mind, if I am wrong please correct me, it started with the mystery of Crucifixion of Jesus, while it was not a mystery at all, then they based atonement, ascension, son-ship and divinity on it, a heap of mysteries over mysteries, which the followers with any common sense could never understand .The result was that the followers of Catholic Religion became having a Blind Faith, while the faith is strong only if it is research oriented having no secrets and no mysteries. This is what I believe, others have every right to disagree or agree with me. Thanks

https://www.mylot.com/paarsurrey

OOO

paarsurrey adds:

Not only the Catholics hide things under the veil of “mystery” from the simple, sincere and faithful followers of Jesus but all the 32000+ Pauline-Christian denominations including the JWs, Latter Day Saints aka Mormons and Bahais commit this error equally:

Pauline-Christianity is based on a made-up vision of Paul (and the credulous Pauline-Christians, mislead by him believe it) with below mentioned false creeds, I understand:

  1. Jesus s/o Mary died a cursed death on the Cross (with no reliable eyewitness to narrate it)
  2. to lift the burden of the sins of the sinful Christians including Paul and the disciples and or the Apostles (as none other than Jesus is innocent as Christians are made to believe)
  3. Jesus s/o Mary rose from the dead, (it is false concept), as he did not die on the Cross to start with, (it was crafted to make Jesus God, which is never true).
  4. And then Jesus s/o Mary secretly traveled to Galilee (a false pretext, if Jesus s/o Mary was God then he needed not to move about secretly)
  5. and from Galilee Jesus s/o Mary ascended to the skies (another false claim, if Jesus was God he would have ascended to skies right from Golgotha where he was put on the Cross)
  6. (What facility is there in Galilee that made it easier for Jesus to ascend to sky from Galilee that was not available in Golgotha)
  7. And Jesus sat on the right hand of God-the-Father and the “spectators” saw him seated (none mentioned by names and other verifiable antecedents of them)
  8. (And none of them mentioned as to how long did they see Jesus in the sky and then he disappeared from the sky, and why can’t they see him now seated there.)

Paul in a way made confession (of his wrong doing) later:

1 Corinthians 15:13-15
13 If there is no resurrection of the dead, then not even Christ has been raised. 14 And if Christ has not been raised, our preaching is worthless, and so is your faith. 15 In that case, we are also exposed as false witnesses about God.”

1 Corinthians 15:14 And if Christ has not been raised, our preaching is worthless, and so is your faith.

Yes, Paul is exposed that he faked the vision and corrupted the Gospels to fit his Anti-Christ ideas (agenda). Right, please?
This is the basis of the Pauline-Christianity whatever their denomination, be they the Catholics or Protestants or the later denominations like JWs or LDS or the Bahais who believe Jesus died on the Cross.
Right, please?
The above denominations/religions may refute the above argument, please .
The above is the status of Pauline-Mythical-Jesus who never existed, I understand. I however respect innocent Jesus s/o Mary the Messenger/Prophet of God sent to the Jews, let it to be very clear here.
I am an ordinary man in the street with no claim of any piety or any scholarship, correct/convince me if I am wrong, please.

Regards

8 Points that expose wrong Pauline-Christianity

OOO

Holy War -the peaceful version- with reasons, arguments and peaceful dialogue

The News:

One will, perhaps, love to read the following:

“Holy War”: Is it Armageddon? with its ” Peaceful Version”! 1

“Holy War”: Is it Armegiddon / Armageddon? – with its “Peaceful Version”! 1 | paarsurrey (wordpress.com)

One will be taken aback to note that Armegiddon/Armageddon is nothing like as one would have imagined or known so far. It is not to be fought with any physical and destructive weaponry and or the lethal arsenal of the day. It is peaceful and in fact, I understand, it has already started and it is sown like a seed!

It was a debate between the Pauline-Christianity (represented by Mr. Abdullah Atham) and the Second Coming 1835-1908 , that took place in Urdu language and was published then by the name “Jang-e-Muqaddas” in 1893 ( 22 May 1893 to 5 June 1893) in the then British India and has been recently translated and published in English by the name “The Holy War”:

The Holy War — A DEBATE BETWEEN ISLAM & CHRISTIANITY — Jang-e-Muqaddas (alislam.org)

Right?

From: a peaceful Ahmadiyya Muslim

OOO  

These are the days of Armageddon – the final battle between good and evil –The peaceful Version! 3 

Has Armageddon already started with the advent of Second Coming 1835-1908 ?– The peaceful Version! 2

Tags:

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: