Hot Debate : Atheism/Agnosticism/Skeptics/Humanism- they have just wayward opinions

Post #239

Paarsurrey wrote:

One is wrong here again.
There is no value of a thing, however one may boast about one’s product, unless it is fetched to the market, where its price is determined by its usefulness by the society. Atheism/Agnosticism/Skeptics/Humanism however they may boast about their ideology, they have never in this planet earth ever been able to establish any society/culture/civilization worth the names. They have no norms, just wayward opinions made in utmost confusion. All cultures/civilisation so far since inception have been established by the religions, and they have the scriptures that have done this marvellous job and the heroic characters/deeds of the religions founders. It is for this splendid service of the humanity that the religions quote from there scriptures. Quran/Islam/Muhammad/Mirza-Ghulam-Ahmad has established the practice to not only quote from the scripture one believes in but the gist of the reason as well, so that others could make the comparison and find the truth.
Atheism/Agnosticism/Skeptics/Humanism happened to be deprived of this advantage, I have therefore provided them a convenience:

“The Atheists and their like, should quote from a text book of science, as the these people so often fall back on science as an ideal for humans, though science does not cover these aspects of human life and science is a common product of religions and non-religions in physical and material fields .
The Atheists and their like could also quote from one ideal book on these matters written by Atheists etc in the times of religious Heroes namely Krishna, Zoroaster, Buddha, Moses, Jesus and Muhammad, for the purpose of comparison.
I hope, if one is not short of rich arguments, one would be respectful to the friends here and would not indulge in derision, ridicule so that the discussion is not disrupted. So kindly remain focused on the topic of the thread and good arguments.”​

It is in the spirit of comparison and not for victory.
Isn’t it “original”? Please


Tags: , , ,

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: