Following comments were exchanged between paarsurrey and others @
paarsurrey to Wetzel:
I think mocking and belittling is not a good or a moral humane behavior on the part of the scientists, if they do it.
The truthful revealed religions represented by the stalwarts like Krishna, Buddha, Zoroaster, Moses, Socrates, Jesus, Muhammad and Mirza Ghulam Ahmad have never opposed the scientists or the science. If anyone of them have; somebody please quote from them.
These stalwarts and their Revealed Word was to guide the human beings in the ethical,moral and spiritual realms and they confined themselves to these realms.
The scientific and material endeavors have been left free for human inquiry and investigations as these are in the secular realm.
xscd @ paarsurrey
Could you please translate your comments into simple English, or condense your basic point(s) into a comprehensible and succinct summary statement? Thank you.
If you’re saying that science and religion are mutually exclusive, there would be a lot of people who would disagree with you. Many religious people believe in evolution and God simultaneously, and regard the creation myth of the Bible’s Genesis and other creation myths as just that.
paarsurrey @ xscd
The Truthful Revealed Religion is the Word of the One-True-God; and the science having its basis in the nature is the Work of the One-True-God (Allah Allah Yahweh Ahura-Mazda Parmeshawara Ishawara) . since the Word and Work belong to the same personage; if truthfully understood, both are not and cannot be contradictory.
I think it would help.
English is not my mother language; if I have not been able to express it fully; one may ask me another question, please.
Thanks
xscd @ paarsurrey
Thank you. That additional response clarified your position.
Tags: belittling, humane behavior, mocking, moral behavior, Nature, religion, science, Word of the One-True-God, Work of the One-True-God
paarsurrey 
January 14, 2014 at 11:23 pm |
Mocking and belittling exposes a lack of compassion likely rooted in a lack of understanding. I think it’s that simple, regardless of who it comes from.
LikeLike
January 15, 2014 at 1:19 am |
The New Atheists, as I understand, have adopted to ridicule and to mock the differing human beings as a matter of policy instead of concentrating on to their arguments.
I think it is their lack of confidence in the correctness of their ideology or perhaps it denotes of having finished their stocks of reasoning.
I however respect them as long as they remain committed to reason; if they start to ridicule and to mock then I prefer to withdraw myself from the discussion.
LikeLike
January 15, 2014 at 3:05 am
It’s unfortunate when people feel that talking down to others is a good way to get a point across, because it tends to cause resentment rather than agreement.
LikeLike
January 15, 2014 at 2:31 pm
It is really unfortunate.
It is for this that I don’t debate with anybody; I only discuss.
As soon I see that a discussion is converting it to a debate; I withdraw myself from it.
I don’t debate to win; I would rather declare one who is eager to debate to win as if he is a winner beforehand and then would like to discuss.
I am going to write a post on it today.
Thanks and regards
LikeLike
January 15, 2014 at 3:00 pm
I have written the post:
https://paarsurrey.wordpress.com/2014/01/15/i-dont-debate-to-win-or-lose/
LikeLike