★ Refuting William Lane Craig || Part 1 ★

It is a big “If”; William Lane Craig is wrong here. Jesus did not die on the Cross; he was delivered from the Cross in the near-dead position but very much alive; Jesus was treated for the wounds inflicted ton him on the Cross; and when he was recovered fit to travel he travelled to India.

Please read the book “Jesus in India” by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad- the Promised Messiah and Imam Mahdi from the following link:


One Response to “★ Refuting William Lane Craig || Part 1 ★”

  1. Hank Kimball Says:

    I don’t care what people claim he did.I am not offended by people’s opinions I place myself in a position to see or hear. All Jesus had to do was DIE WITHOUT disobeying God. His whole reason for coming is clear in the scriptures. He had no self-seeking motives. He came to do the will of God.

    If Adam and Eve had not disobeyed God, there would have been no reason for Jesus to come and spiritually and literally replace Adam; hence, there would be NO reason for the bible. All God’s humans would be in complete and perfect alliance with the will of God. All children would be raised in God fearing homes.
    Imagine a world where there is NO bad or negative influence???
    That was God’s intention, and it STILL is God’s intention.

    When the suggestion is that God’s first experience with humans was here on earth; logically, it makes sense. Disobedience would have come before in some other planet, and Adam and Eve would have been created with MORE intelligence or love for God and been able to resist temptation.(or something). That’s reasonable. BUT;when it is suggested that, the fact that the bible IS, shows that God has a ‘learning curve’; people’s minds snap shut. They conclude,that God cannot BE real, because that truth makes God imperfect and God can’t be imperfect. Atheist would conclude this ALL on THEIR OWN understanding prior to being told it. Having NO experience with what it means to be God, OR a PERFECT God, and solely by their own FINITE reason and logic they make conclusions about God not being because it doesn’t FIT THEIR THINKING MIND.! That’s called PREJUDICE.

    Why people conclude that because they cannot see touch smell or see and taste IT, IT cannot be real, is also prejudice. Who DEFINES what is REAL??

    Not being able to AT LEAST entertain the idea that there is MORE than what we can sense with the body is missing so much. It baffles me; and it shouldn’t, it’s scriptural. God has blocked them from Him. I’m not sure of who really is and isn’t. But, there are people that God has already judged and closed the door on, so to speak. The holy spirit does not enter them, to think beyond the material. Not knowing who, means I must preach it to any and all people. I’m in it to please Him. Effort is what matters, NOT results. MOSTLY, that is. To be offended or angry with people that scoff at my preaching is EGO; and it means my thinking is INCORRECT.


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: