The Bible scribes did character assassination of the messenger prophets to attract more people

All messengers prophets of the one true God were perfect men; it is the scribes who did character assassination of them and made them like that they were sinful.

Being a perfect man or an innocent man is a pre-requisite of messenger prophet of the one true creator God.

The selection of the one true God or His choosing from among the human beings is never wrong.

In the olden times the narrators would verbally or out of their memory narrate the stories of the religious heroes of their people; to allure more people to their gatherings; they put some drama and scandals or cheap narratives in them to make them more interesting; later when the things were committed to writing these stories got added up.

A little thinking; when one’s read the Bible one discerns it.

Advertisements

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

2 Responses to “The Bible scribes did character assassination of the messenger prophets to attract more people”

  1. Hank Kimball (@HankKimball1) Says:

    Interesting. According to who? Based on what? The statement: “Being a perfect man or an innocent man is a pre-requisite of messenger prophet of the one true creator God.” I am sure you have some ancient text that can be verified as making the claim that messenger prophets of the one true God are perfect and innocent.
    I do not hold that in order that a man be a servant of God or a prophet of God or a messenger prophet, as you put it, he needs to be perfect. If it isn’t in the bible, AND it COMPLETELY renounces statements the bible makes; the source needs consideration.
    If you would be so kind as to please quote the source when making claims that contradict scripture.
    There are men that find singleness of purpose and who have read much of the ancient indian text, or sanskrit or Vedas, who have translated and leaned on their own understanding and MAYBE have made a claim such as yours. That would be within the last 100 years or so. Other than that I know of no other source material of scripture that makes such a claim. Sometimes we are impressed with an idea by other well intentioned people that doesn’t really come from scripture, and it even contradicts the scripture. A man must choose what he is to believe I guess. The book I read states in Proverbs 3:5, “Trust in Jehovah with all your heart and do not lean upon your own understanding.”
    1John 4: 1-3: Beloved ones, do not believe every inspired expression, but test the inspired expressions to see whether they originate with God, because many false prophets have gone forth into the world. YOU​ gain the knowledge of the inspired expression from God by this: Every inspired expression that confesses Jesus Christ as having come in the flesh originates with God, but every inspired expression that does not confess Jesus does not originate with God. Furthermore, this is the antichrist’s [inspired expression] which ​YOU​ have heard was coming, and now it is already in the world. The following is from the old testament and written some 730 years B C——
    Isaiah 9:6-7For there has been a child born to us, there has been a son given to us; and the princely rule will come to be upon his shoulder. And his name will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Eternal Father, Prince of Peace. To the abundance of the princely rule and to peace there will be no end, upon the throne of David and upon his kingdom in order to establish it firmly and to sustain it by means of justice and by means of righteousness, from now on and to time indefinite. The very zeal of Jehovah of armies will do this.-
    The understanding is that the child born refers to Jesus. Jesus existed before any other creation. John 1:1-3 In the beginning the Word was, and the Word was with God, and the Word was a god. This one was in the beginning with God. All things came into existence through him, and apart from him not even one thing came into existence.
    John 1:14 So the Word became flesh and resided among us, and we had a view of his glory, a glory such as belongs to an only‐begotten son from a father; and he was full of undeserved kindness and truth.
    Matthew 15: 1-9-,Then there came to Jesus from Jerusalem Pharisees and scribes, saying: “Why is it your disciples overstep the tradition of the men of former times? For example, they do not wash their hands when about to eat a meal.”In reply he said to them: “Why is it ​you also overstep the commandment of God because of ​your​ tradition? For example, God said, ‘Honor your father and your mother’; and, ‘Let him that reviles father or mother end up in death.’ But ​you say, ‘Whoever says to his father or mother: “Whatever I have by which you might get benefit from me is a gift dedicated to God,”he must not honor his father at all.’ And so ​you​ have made the word of God invalid because of ​your​ tradition. You​ hypocrites, ISAIAH aptly prophesied about ​you, when he said,This people honors me with their lips, yet their heart is far removed from me. It is in vain that they keep worshiping me, because they teach commands of men as doctrines.’” Old testament in Isaiah which Jesus claims in Matthew Isaiah had prophesied some 730 years before. Isaiah 29:13 states – And Jehovah says:’……….. this people have come near with their mouth, and they have glorified me merely with their lips, and they have removed their heart itself far away from me, and their fear toward me becomes men’s commandment that is being taught,” I could do this all day my friend. There are so many prophesies in the old testament that become fulfilled in the new testament. Now the original hebrew and aramaic scriptures were finish almost 500 years before Jesus birth. They were available to the scribes and pharrises of Jesus time. The knew the prophesies and King Herod sent soldiers out to kill all children under the age of 2 yrs, because he believe Jesus was prophesied to become King by over throwing him. He leaned on his own understanding so children had to die. So they had the old testament intact when Jesus was born. The bible is a collection of books written over a 1600 year period. The old took roughly 1100 years to compile. The new testament took roughly 100 years. So there’s roughly 400 years between the end of the old, and the beginning of the writing of the new.
    Isaiah was a prophet. At no time does the bible state any prophet is without sin or innocent or perfect.
    You seem to have this shame based idea about God. Why is it that you believe a man MUST be perfect in order to serve God? I mean, certainly he cannot be IN sin when serving God. A man could possibly sin and be forgiven IF that man is honestly sorry for his conduct and allows God to direct his attention to what he should do and DO IT. God only chooses men he wants to. There is no set resume that God has dubbed ‘the kind of man I choose to serve me as a prophet” God doesn’t feel he needs to explain his reasons I guess. BUT, God DOES makes it very clear what all men must do in order to receive eternal life. John 3:16 and John 17: 3 make it simple, respectively—For God loved the world so much that he gave his only‐begotten Son, in order that everyone exercising faith in him might not be destroyed but have everlasting life./ 17:3-This means everlasting life, their taking in knowledge of you, the only true God, and of the one whom you sent forth, Jesus Christ” It is saying that just by honestly taking in knowledge of the one true God SOMETHING so profound happens, that eternal life is the result. This may sound like I’m joking, but, it is almost as if the real miracle of transformation in understanding happens almost as if by osmosis! Don’t laugh, remember, I said ALMOST

    • paarsurrey Says:

      I quote a passage from your post:

      “The statement: “Being a perfect man or an innocent man is a pre-requisite of messenger prophet of the one true creator God.” I am sure you have some ancient text that can be verified as making the claim that messenger prophets of the one true God are perfect and innocent.”

      Why you hold an ancient scripture more reliable than a new one from the one true God ?

      Vedas are believed to be ancient scriptures than the OT or NT; do you believe them more reliable than the OT or NT Bibles.

      Your arguments please.

      Also please quote from Moses and Jesus that the ancient scriptures are more reliable than the new ones.

      One should note that every scripture that is ancient now was at one time a new one at his time.

      I think one must have a clear criteria for the reliability or truthfulness of a scripture whether it is old one or new one.

      Thanks for your comments.

      Regards

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: